## Specification Analysis Report

### Scope and provenance

Read-only audit completed using AgentBay and the installed `analyze` skill. All required inputs are present.

Selected upstream: `Azure-Samples/Spec2Cloud`, commit `cbcdcf5c5ea904b3d81a32abfa75c6bc0bc49a83`, path `plugins/speckit-spec2cloud/skills/analyze/SKILL.md`.

Installed `.agents/skills/analyze/SKILL.md` matches `source-map.json`:

- SHA-256: `b281ef8eeb57ee846c0cff81c1dec36dcb174e4be9de610aafe0aeedbf9f9f0e`
- Git blob: `017d80c0cf69bbc6cd941ad035171f10079c0c18`

AgentBay’s installed skill hash also matches the map. Both instruction files were read completely; analyze has no companion resources. This was selected-upstream verification, not a catalogue search. The skill is listed in the session; no accounts or additional dependencies were needed.

### Findings

| ID | Category | Severity | Location(s) | Summary | Recommendation |
|----|----------|----------|-------------|---------|----------------|
| — | — | — | Audited artifacts | No findings. | No remediation required. |

Constitution constraints align with `specs/onboarding/spec.md §Files and boundaries` and `specs/onboarding/plan.md §Global Constraints`: local-only behavior, text-only rendering, recoverable failure, immutable supplied checks/adapter, and separate prototype and final implementation.

`tasks.md:7–9` and `tasks.json:2–28` agree on IDs, descriptions, order, dependencies, parallel relationships, coverage, files and status. Dependencies are acyclic and ordered; parallel tasks have separate files. No dangling requirement references, duplication, unresolved markers, material ambiguity or underspecification were found.

### Coverage

Locations below refer to `specs/onboarding/spec.md`. Its eight functional requirements contain the acceptance outcomes; no separate success-criterion IDs are declared.

| Requirement / Criterion | Has Task? | Task IDs | Notes |
|-------------------------|-----------|----------|-------|
| FR-001 — line 6 | Yes | T002, T003 | Welcome markup and navigation |
| FR-002 — line 7 | Yes | T002, T003 | Associated label and retained input |
| FR-003 — line 8 | Yes | T001, T003 | Exact empty-title error; no write |
| FR-004 — line 9 | Yes | T001, T003 | Trimmed 1–80-character title; text rendering |
| FR-005 — line 10 | Yes | T003 | Visible saving state, disabled controls, duplicate guard |
| FR-006 — line 11 | Yes | T003 | One-shot failure, retained title, explicit retry |
| FR-007 — line 12 | Yes | T003 | Dashboard, persistence and reload behavior |
| FR-008 — line 13 | Yes | T002, T003 | Visible focus and all three viewport widths |

### Unmapped Tasks

None. Every task maps to valid requirements and declares its files.

### Azure Readiness

Not applicable. `specs/onboarding/plan.md:7–18` declares local persistence and excludes backend, accounts and deployment. No Azure resources are declared, so provisioning, IaC, RBAC, networking, region and cloud-secret configuration are outside scope.

### Metrics

- Requirements: 8
- Separate success criteria: 0
- Tasks: 3 (pending: 3, done: 0)
- Coverage: 100% (8/8 requirements)
- Total findings: 0
- Ambiguity findings: 0
- Duplication findings: 0
- CRITICAL findings: 0

### Next actions

The audited artifacts have no identified blockers to a later, explicitly authorized implementation stage. Follow T001–T003 and their existing verification steps. Node 24 runtime verification remains explicitly outstanding in `plan.md:20`; implementation and check results are not claimed.

No files were changed, no checks or companion scripts were run, and no human approval is asserted. There are no findings requiring remediation suggestions.